Posted by: socialstructures270 | October 27, 2010

Crying Girl by Carter McFall

1.       The Piece I chose is “Crying Girl” by Roy Lichtenstein. It was located at the Millwaukee Art Museum during our trip. Roy was one of the most prominent Pop Artists of the century. His work was favored mostly for its use of old comic strip parodies. During the height of his career he was featured in the Castelli Gallery in New York along side other Pop Artists  such as Andy Warhol and Jasper Johns.

2.       “Crying Girl” was located in the Modern art section of the Millwaukee Art Museum with a wide variety of artists and techniques that were brought mostly out of the 20th Century. The piece was not accompanied with much information other than the artist, title, and the date it was created (1964). It is a fairly large canvas approximately five feet square and probably composed of oil paints on white stretched canvas. The woman shown in the painting is composed of flat black lines filled in with flat primary and basic colors. The detail of the character is very low and resembles that of an ink stamp or screen print. Although the colors are flat, Lichtenstein created dimension and texture on her face with his signature comic book pointillism. This gave it much of a news print comic feel. It is a very highly contrasted image with a low diversity of value and colors. At glance it is a very large and simple image.

3.       Many critics would describe the Pop Art movement to be an “American” movement but Roy Lichtenstein would disagree as he claimed his work and others to be “industrial art”. He explained that he would never attempt to reproduce his subjects but to tackle the way that the mass media sees them. This is easily understandable, not at first with “Crying Girl”, but after looking at many similar works by Lichtenstein. His characters look like they were ripped right out of news paper and magnified for a closer look at it’s social obscenities. His message in my eyes was a mockery of how these men and women, such as in “crying girl”, are portrayed to be. The mass media has this simple idea of how a person should look and act and Lichtenstein takes a highlighter to point these out in his art. The red lipstick and wavy blonde hair. The romantic ideal of these comic strips is the fantasy that the media has created for most Americans who see them. This is a common trend of “Pop” art, to take figures and images from the media and distorting them and exposing them for what they may be underneath the glamour. Another one of Lichtensteins more famous paintings “Whaaam!” is an image of a fighter jet destroying another. At first glance one would see it as a war comic strip, but under Roy’s looking glass you see the blood red fire of the explosion that is protruding from the dying pilot’s plane. This is just another example that Roy highlights from the mass media where the idea of killing and war is glorified into this heroic thing to take part in. Much of this can be derived from his experiences in World War II. Over all the painting is simple and almost unoriginal, but as an idea and as a concept it is an individual commentary on how the mass media distorts what we see as iconic.

Advertisement

Responses

  1. I’ve always been a very big fan of Lichtenstein for his “industrial art.” When I was younger it was because just they looked like comic book frames and I love the style, but as I got older and learned more about his work and the purpose of it, his works continued to hold a special meaning for me because of the way they can hold so much meaning, such as in The Crying Girl’s portrait. I agree with your perception that Lichtenstein is deliberately using her red lips, blonde hair, fair skin, to show a common Western perception of beauty. Then, to show her crying, is to reveal that even a paragon of beauty is still not perfect; obviously something happened that caused her mask to slip and reveal true emotions.

  2. that’s a great piece in my opinion. Juts like most of his work, Lichtenstein’s “Crying Girl” make great use of color combination, very original and unique.
    You have good pints on how Lichtenstein gave comic new look, or new comic look to the art world. Using simple images with minimalistic diversity of value and colors and still, he was able to create something simple but yet beautiful in its simplicity.

    -Gili Cohen

  3. You gave us really good information about this piece, which I’m glad for because I didn’t get a chance to see it while in the museum. I’ve seen this piece in art books and I’m envious that you got to see it in person.
    One thing I’m really glad you pointed out was the idea of Lichestenstein creating what we intend to see, or what America wants to see.l (A beautiful woman with blonde hair and red lips.) It’s something that I wouldn’t have consciously thought about, but now that it is mentioned it is the main theme I see.

    -Zada Doyle

  4. I really enjoyed this piece as well. The last line of your statement made me think about the idea of a piece of work being iconic and how the mass media influences that. When I think about the “crying girl” being iconic, i think that imagery not necessarily the image itself is iconic. I believe too that mass media has a lot to do with it as well, because if the media wasn’t showing us the imagery many people wouldn’t be exposed to it. I also understand where it would be considered iconic for the “pop art” movement as a representative piece of the whole movement.

    Bonnie Kreger


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.